POLITICO has published an article by Sara Solovitch on the status of passivhaus in Portland, and some of the disagreements between Passive House Institute US (PHIUS) and Passive House Institute (PHI).
i received an email a couple of weeks ago alerting us that our PV array was generating less energy than typical, and that the system should be inspected. this is one of the benefits of leasing a PV system. after a quick climb to the upper roof the problem was obvious - the sedum from the green roof had grown up and over the base of most of the panels. while in hindsight it may have been better to mount the panels higher above the roof, in less than 30 minutes the sedum was cleared off and away from the panels and they were washed clean. later this fall i will prune back the sedum and again check in on the array.
it's interesting to compare our actual annual consumption to the predicted consumption per the PHPP model. this project was modeled in PHPP 2007, and there has been some criticism in the passive house community suggesting that the German default values for electrical consumption built into PHPP are far too low for the US culture. (PHIUS has gone so far as to radically change the default values for electrical consumption). given the data on our project, i'm not so sure there is a problem.
occupant behavior of course plays a significant role in energy consumption, and there are a number of conditions to note for this building. PHPP assumes 4 occupants for a house of this size, when in reality there are only 2 of us (plus 1 dog and 2 cats) which should result in lower overall energy consumption. with fewer occupants, there will be lower internal gains which presumably would increase slightly the heating demand and heat load. Because we both work from home much of the week with computers and other devices running all day, it could be assumed that while there are only 2 of us, our consumption includes both home and work and would therefore be higher. I also should note (somewhat sheepishly) that we have 3 cables boxes that stay on all the time, including one DVR, which draw a steady amount of electricity and generate some heat. This is all somewhat anecdotal, but it shows the inherent complexity in accurately predicting energy consumption.
an annual summary of our site electricity consumption and site energy production (from our roof mounted 4.32 kW array) shows that we generated 82% of the electricity we consumed.
an annual summary of our site energy consumption (gas and electric) and site energy production shows that we generated 49% of the total energy we consumed.
a monthly summary of our site energy consumption (gas and electric) and site energy production (from our roof mounted 4.32 kW array) shows the large deficit during the winter months as expected. more efficient equipment for our space heat and hot water would certainly help to offset some of this deficit. while a larger PV array would get us closer to net zero on an annual basis, it wouldn't solve this deficit and demonstrates one of the problems with an approach that focuses solely on annual net zero energy. elrond burrell has written an excellent blog post covering this topic.
a monthly summary of our annual gas and electric bills demonstrates our consistently low monthly utility costs. our average monthly cost for both gas and electricity over the last year was $36.53.
note that for most of the year we pay our electricity provider the minimum monthly charge even though we are generating more electricity than we are using. our only gas appliance is our hot water heater, and a significant portion of our small monthly gas bill is for fees and taxes regardless of our consumption. if we were to change our gas water heater to electric even without a change in energy consumption, our monthly utility cost would be even lower by eliminating the minimum gas charges.
aside from reducing our CO2 emissions and our consistently tiny utility bills, we're staying extremely comfortable year round - warm in the winter while barely using our heating system, and cool in the summer without any air conditioning. so the answer is unequivocally yes, it is definitely working.
we just wrapped up our open house and it was very well attended. thanks to everyone who came by. we hope you were inspired in one way or another.
still time to see some of the other passive house projects in town.
It is well known that compactness is an important aspect of a well designed and cost effective Passivhaus as it has a considerable impact on the overall heat demand. Having now modeled a number of projects in PHPP (Passive House Planning Package), I decided to do a quick comparison of the ratio of envelope to floor area (known as the form factor) as well as the average R-value of the entire envelope. Here are a few examples:
envelope to treated floor area: 3.8
average R-value: 39.4
envelope to treated floor area: 3.7
average R-value: 29.7
18th Ave Residence
envelope to treated floor area: 3.2
average R-value: 24.1
envelope to treated floor area: 2.7
average R-value: 25.9
envelope to treated floor area: 1.5
average R-value: 19.7
While there are many variables at play that make each project distinct, it is clear that form factor has a huge impact. Remember boxy can be beautiful!
skidmore passivhaus was recently featured on houzz. check it out:
really this post should be titled: "selecting a heating system for a small passivhaus in portland oregon"
with an extremely low heating load, a passivhaus makes most typical residential heating systems unnecessary and unsuitable in terms of size and cost (this includes gas forced air furnace, ground source heat pump, and hydronic radiant heating). for skidmore passivhaus (1965 sf house /1680 sf treated floor area), the peak heating load per PHPP was estimated to be 5,657 btu/hr (at a design temperature of 32deg F). as an example, a small wood stove might produce about 20-30,000 btu/hr when running hot, far too much from a single point source in a passivhaus. in addition, providing fresh air for combustion and sealing all the penetrations creates complications, plus we frequently have no burn restrictions during our coldest winter days. a very small gas furnace still produces about 30,000 btu/hr, and delivers warm air at a higher velocity than is really comfortable. both systems could easily overheat a small passivhaus and each have their pros and cons. while gas here is still cheap and the electric grid nationwide is pretty dirty, most of our electricity in the northwest is generated by hydro and is clean and generally considered renewable.
so for our small passivhaus in portland, we considered the following all electric options:
Electric Resistance Heating
- very low first cost and simple to install (under $1k installed)
- easy to zone and control individually
- no maintenance
- silent (radiant or convection type)
- ok aesthetic (not great though)
- inefficient compared to heat pump (COP 1)
- difficult to meet PH with all electric energy sources
- not great aesthetic
Ductless Mini Split Heat Pump
- high efficiency (COP 3:1 or greater)
- ability to provide cooling
- variety of sizes starting at around 9000 btu/hr
- higher first cost (roughly $4k - $5k installed for 1 head with 1 outdoor unit)
- requires open plan / poor distribution to closed rooms
- difficult to zone (add roughly $2k for additional head)
- fairly unpleasing aesthetic (add $500 for slightly better looking floor mounted head)
- often requires some electric resistance heating as supplement
- ability to provide cooling means increased energy consumption (if cooling used)
Ducted Mini Split Heat Pump
- high efficiency (slightly less than ductless mini split)
- ability to provide cooling
- pleasing aesthetic / discreet (concealed ductwork)
- good distribution (ductwork required)
- variety of sizes starting at around 9000 btu/hr
- higher first cost (roughly $7k installed)
- requires space to locate concealed unit and run ductwork
- ability to provide cooling means increased energy consumption (if cooling used)
Heating Skidmore Passivhaus
at skidmore passivhaus we elected to use electric resistance wall mounted heaters. in our climate mechanical cooling seems like an unnecessary and wasteful luxury, and we frankly did not want it at all. instead we opted for operable exterior shades on the large south facing windows to significantly reduce summer heat gain. combined with well placed operable windows + doors and a nice amount of exposed thermal mass, the house stays extremely comfortable even during the hottest days of the summer.
although the improved efficiency of a heat pump was (and still is) extremely appealing, we struggled with the significant additional cost, the appearance of the ductless heads, and the difficulty in zoning. for the money saved installing the electric resistance heaters (we spent under $1k total) we were able to install a decent sized roof mounted solar PV array. had we not built to passivhaus, we would not have considered this approach.
we installed a total of 4 individual convection heaters made by Convectair ranging from 1250 watts - 1750 watts each. these convection heaters don't have a fan so they are completely silent. while there is an option to connect the heaters and control them from a single programmable thermostat, we opted to keep them individually controlled for maximum flexibility. without the programmable thermostat we have to adjust each heater daily, but this has simply become part of our routine and works for us because of our unpredictable schedules.
because the plan is organized essentially as a one bedroom house with a separate wing with individual work spaces, an electric heater in each work space allows for simple control as separate zones. the open living room has one heater, while the remaining heater is in the master bedroom upstairs. because the house is so tight and well insulated, a number of rooms don't have any heating source yet remain perfectly comfortable including the pantry, 'breezeway', main floor bathroom, and upstairs walk in closet. the kitchen, entry, and dining room are open to the living room and served by the living room heater. the master bathroom has only an electric radiant mat under the tile floor.
our total system approaches 20,000 btu/hr (5750 watts x 3.413 btu/hr/watt), but it is distributed throughout the house and we rarely have all of the units running at the same time. after our first winter, the house stayed extremely comfortable as expected with only a few degrees variation between the warmest and coolest rooms. during our record cold weather this winter (almost 3 weeks with lows dipping into the teens and cloudy snowy skies for much of it) the living room heater struggled a bit to raise the temperature very quickly when setback at night. in hindsight that heater was probably undersized considering that it serves a huge portion of the house - the 2 story living room (with large areas of glass and lots of mass), dining room, kitchen, entry, breezeway, and pantry. we are considering adding a small additional heater to the living room area just for those extreme cases.
while many may question our decision to use electric resistance heat and a PV array, for our super low load passivhaus and particular situation it seemed to make sense. overall we are pleased with the system although it is definitely not sophisticated, super efficient, nor great looking. while we don't have individual data loggers installed yet to track electricity used for heating specifically and to monitor indoor temp and humidity, we will be posting general information about our overall energy consumption this summer documenting our first year of living in the house. hopefully we will begin logging data for year two.
we'd love to hear your thoughts, suggestions, corrections, etc. as we continue to ponder appropriate systems for some of our new projects currently in design.
there's quite a bit of excitement in the air surrounding our skidmore passivhaus. in addition to officially receiving passivhaus certification (PHIUS +), the house was awarded an earth advantage platinum rating and energy star northwest certified. back in early october the house was featured on the aia portland's design matters tour of exceptional homes, and was the only passivhaus on the tour.
a few weeks ago a 4.32kW PV system was installed on the upper roof which is expected to help the house approach net zero energy use.
we're also excited to present a handful of new photos completed by local architectural photographer jeremy bittermann.
drop us a line if you have questions, want to learn more, or just to say something nice.
you can also follow us on twitter @insituarch
check back for more updates soon.
we look forward to sharing the knowledge gained on our first completed passivhaus and helping others create well designed high performance low load buildings.
more we now have a little patch of green lawn and some rusty planters to go with our deck. summer is here.
with the amount of high shgc glass on our south facade, it would be easy to overheat without proper shading.
on the hottest days, we simply close our exterior shades to block unwanted solar radiation before it hits the glass. the ability to fully control the shades means we can optimize the amount of gain or shade we are getting depending on the daily conditions.
the shades can be tilted to allow views out while still blocking the sun. the cost of the shades was offset by the elimination of cooling equipment and the cost of the energy to operate it.
the exterior shades combined with the exceptional insulation and thermal mass has kept our house exceptionally cool and comfortable without any air conditioning.
more detail to follow. check back soon.
we recently performed our final air-tightness test at skidmore passivhaus with a result of .32ach at 50pa. we are extremely pleased that our clear air-barrier strategy and diligent execution paid off.
here's a snapshot of our final phpp #'s:
there is no doubt that achieving passive house, particularly in our climate, is fairly easily achievable. it does require smart design, careful planning, a contractor that understands and pays attention, and a healthy dose of persistence. if you are ready to build one for yourself, drop us a line at email@example.com.
more pictures and info coming soon.
we hope to be putting the final touches on in the next few weeks. lots of catching up to do. check back soon for more on this project and others.
rough-in work has wrapped up on skidmore passivhaus and it's time to look at a few of the features under the hood. this new airtight home (or shall we say leak-free) is equipped with mechanical lungs.
we chose the PH certified zehnder comfoair 200 hrv, capable of producing up to 125 cfm of continuous ventilation. this project requires about 70 cfm (60% setting) to achieve .31 air changes per hour (or roughly 1 air change every 3 hours).
the 3" flexible ductwork is a double-walled proprietary system called comfotube made by zehnder. very easy and fast to install. the goal is to keep the runs as short and straight as possible.
the round ceiling rough-in boxes are used for either supply or exhaust air. either 1 tube or 2 tubes are connected depending on the cfm requirements. exhausts are located in the bathrooms (20 cfm continuous) and kitchen (30 cfm continuous). we have 3 exhaust locations - each with 2 tubes. there are 4 supply locations.
supply air is typically provided at the ceilings but we have a low supply register in the double height living room.
the tubing terminates in the ceiling of the mechanical room. 6 supply tubes and 6 exhaust tubes. manifolds gather the supply and exhaust tubes respectively and connect them to the unit.
exhaust air flows through the machine, the heat is captured in the core, and the air is expelled to the outside.
fresh air is brought into the machine from the exterior, and warmed by the heat captured from the outgoing air. the zehnder is about 92% efficient and uses just 7.1 watts / cfm.
the fresh air supply and exhaust are ducted in well insulated metal ductwork from the bottom of the unit to the exterior. the fresh air supply is located high on the exterior wall with the exhaust about 10' below. the duct penetrations were carefully air sealed to the plywood air-barrier. this unit also requires a condensate drain that we've tied with an air gap into the kitchen waste pipe.
the main controller will be located in the kitchen, providing the ability to boost the ventilation rate temporarily to 35 cfm while cooking. each bathroom will have a timed switch to boost the rate to 24 cfm if needed after a shower. we also conveniently have an operable window located in the kitchen and both showers.
thanks to IM Plumbing for help with the installation, and to Matt Grove from Zehnder for help with the design.
sheetrock has wrapped up and painting has begun. check back soon for more.
siding work has mostly wrapped up. the vertical siding is installed on rainscreen over rigid exterior insulation. see this past post for more info on the assembly. here's a first look at the siding pretty much completed.
the siding is off the shelf 1x6 channel made from tight knot cedar. it's stained with 1 coat of olympic semi-transparent stain in ebony.
the large south windows (and doors) have exterior motorized aluminum sun shades supplied by hella. the siding has been detailed to allow the shades to stack in recessed pockets. in this photo the shades are down about 9 inches and just visible on the 2 living room units (lift / slide door and fixed upper unit). more on the shading later.
the "breezeway" features a south facing door / window with a wood canopy (to be painted black) topped with clear tempered glass.
the entry door at left features acid etched glass for privacy and has a smooth accent panel adjacent that will be painted a deep red. the wood canopy will painted black and features a simple galvanized metal pan roof. steel rod will be used to hang the canopy from a bracket mounted to the wall above. a mahogany deck will eventually complete the front porch.
the north street facade also features a narrow smooth accent panel that will be painted with the same deep red. the same siding runs horizontally to form an accent between floors.
check back soon for more.